Open menu

Nanotechnology General News

The latest news from academia, regulators
research labs and other things of interest

Posted: December 10, 2006

Are actuaries prepared for emerging risks such as nanotechnology?

(Nanowerk News) Actuaries should draw on the lessons learned from the notorious exposures of asbestos and pollution to be better prepared to handle new emerging risks like nanotechnology and the avian flu, attendees at the CAS Annual Meeting were told.
Harrison Oellrich, managing director with Guy Carpenter, told attendees that nanotechnology is an example of an emerging exposure with enormous potential benefits as well as risks.
Oellrich cited estimates that 15 percent of global manufacturing worldwide could be made by nanotechnology by 2014. "In the research area, the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) estimates federal spending for nanotechnology R&D at already nearly $1 billion," he said.
Currently around 200 consumer products on the market incorporate nanomaterials, from sun-tan lotions to stain-resistant clothing to tennis racquets, Oellrich noted.
"These undeniable benefits are accompanied by risks, some known and some unknown. We need to be thinking about them so they don't catch us as an industry unawares," he said.
While it is still in doubt whether nanotechnology will be revolutionary, Oellrich urged insurers and reinsurers as enablers of new technologies to better understand the technology and processes underlying this emerging exposure.
"Insurers need to understand the risks, do the research into the possible, even critical risks, and begin to formulate products and coverage to respond to clients' needs," he said.
Raji Bhagavatula, principal and consulting actuary, Milliman, Inc. observed that when it comes to underwriting emerging risks, there are three key questions that should be asked: "Are the risks insurable, can they be underwritten, and are you able to price for these exposures?"
She related that history has taught that the extent of losses associated with asbestos were known to underwriters in hindsight rather than at the time the risks were accepted. Asbestos was never intended to be covered and was not insurable at the time the risk was written.
Claims for emerging risks such as asbestos got paid because of the "all risks" feature of the general liability policy where uninsurable risks have to be handled through exclusions. This is a difficult task as it would require the underwriter to be able to envision future risk scenarios associated with the products at the time of underwriting, she pointed out.
Bhagavatula noted that the insurance industry can be an enabler of new technologies only if it is able to charge enough premium for the risk. She went on to observe that actuaries have a key role to play in facilitating the underwriting process for new emerging exposures.
"When you think about the potential risks associated with emerging exposures, the experience with asbestos and pollution is really helpful as you can draw comparisons. Always ask how can I as an actuary be helpful with this?" Bhagavatula said.
The session was moderated by Gail Ross, principal and consulting actuary, Milliman, Inc.
The Casualty Actuarial Society is an organization dedicated to the advancement of the body of knowledge of actuarial science applied to property, casualty and similar risk exposures. The primary goal of the Casualty Actuarial Society is to provide education and research to help its over 4,000 members be the leading experts in the evaluation of hazard risk and the integration of hazard risk with strategic, financial and operational risk.
Source: The Casualty Actuarial Society
Subscribe to a free copy of one of our daily
Nanowerk Newsletter Email Digests
with a compilation of all of the day's news.
 
If you liked this article, please give it a quick review on reddit or StumbleUpon. Thanks!
 
 
These articles might interest you as well: