Artificial intelligence makes enzyme engineering easy

(Nanowerk News) You can't expect a pharmaceutical scientist to switch labs to the facilities available in a television studio and expect the same research output. Enzymes behave exactly the same. But now, in a study recently published in ACS Synthetic Biology ("Logistic Regression-guided Identification of Cofactor Specificity-contributing Residues in Enzyme with Sequence Datasets Partitioned by Catalytic Properties"), researchers from Osaka University have imparted an analogous level of adaptability to enzymes, a goal that has remained elusive for over 30 years.
Artificial intelligence for enzyme engineering
Enzyme substrate specificity involving material conversion processes is pertinent to e.g. biochemistry, metabolic engineering, and environmental remediation; however, it is one of the most challenging assignments in protein engineering. We revealed that the redox cofactor preference of malic enzymes can be strikingly converted by applying phylogenetic analysis to machine learning, without experimental screening. This method can predict mutation positions and candidate amino acids that affect substrate specificity, which is challenging to infer solely from the crystal structures. Machine learning uses the structurally homologous but functionally distinct enzymes’ amino acid sequences as input datasets to efficiently navigate toward the target function, and potentially provide new fundamental insights into enzyme–substrate specificity. (CC BY-NC-ND, ACS Synthetic Biology)
Enzymes perform impressive functions, enabled by the unique arrangement of their constituent amino acids, but usually only within a specific cellular environment. When you change the cellular environment, the enzyme rarely functions well—if at all. Thus, a long-standing research goal has been to retain or even improve upon the function of enzymes in different environments; for example, conditions that are favorable for biofuel production. Traditionally, such work has involved extensive experimental trial-and-error that might have little assurance of achieving an optimal result.
Artificial intelligence (a computer-based tool) can minimize this trial-and-error, but still relies on experimentally obtained crystal structures of enzymes—which can be unavailable or not especially useful. Thus, "the pertinent amino acids one should mutate in the enzyme might be only best-guesses," says Teppei Niide, co-senior author. "To solve this problem, we devised a methodology of ranking amino acids that depends only on the widely available amino acid sequence of analogous enzymes from other living species."
The researchers focused on the amino acids that are involved in the specificity of the malic enzyme to the molecule that the enzyme transforms (i.e., the substrate) and to the substance that helps the transformation proceed (i.e., the cofactor). By identifying the amino acid sequences that did not change over the course of evolution, the researchers identified the amino acid mutations that are adaptations to different cellular conditions in different species.
"By using artificial intelligence, we identified unexpected amino acid residues in malic enzyme that correspond to the enzyme's use of different redox cofactors," says Hiroshi Shimizu, co-senior author. "This helped us understand the substrate specificity mechanism of the enzyme and will facilitate optimal engineering of the enzyme in laboratories."
This work succeeded in using artificial intelligence to dramatically accelerate and improve the success of substantially reconfiguring an enzyme's specific mode of action, without fundamentally altering the enzyme's function. Future advances in enzyme engineering will greatly benefit fields such as pharmaceutical and biofuel production that require carefully tuning the versatility of enzymes to different biochemical environments—even in the absence of corresponding enzymes’ crystal structures.
Source: Osaka University