Posted: Jun 11, 2013 | |
The physical basis of high-throughput atomically precise manufacturing |
|
(Nanowerk Spotlight, by Eric Drexler via Metamodern) As outlined below, atomically precise manufacturing (APM) can be understood through physics, engineering design principles, proof-of-concept examples, computational modeling, and parallels with familiar technologies. Several chapters in my newly-published book, Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization discuss these topics in depth. | |
Orientation: Parallels between APM and familiar technologies In brief, APM is a prospective production technology based on guiding the motion of reactive molecules to build progressively larger components and systems. Bottom-up atomic precision can enable production with unprecedented scope (in terms of product materials, components, systems, and performance), while fundamental mechanical scaling laws can enable unprecedented productivity. Several familiar technologies offer strong parallels: |
|
|
|
To complete the digital logic analogy: APM systems employ macroscopic arrays of high-frequency nanoscale mechanical devices to process discrete parts, atoms packaged in molecules, to form intricate patterns. | |
Thus, APM can be described a prospective technology based on compact, general-purpose manufacturing systems that use macroscopic arrays of nanoscale devices to move, position, and assemble molecular (and larger) components, bonding them with atomic precision to build macroscale products from the bottom up. Roughly speaking, APM can be described as manufacturing based on a programmable “factory on a chip” technology. | |
APM rests on familiar principles | |
Current knowledge regarding potential systems for high-throughput APM rests on textbook science and engineering principles. This is a deliberate engineering choice: The methodology used at the current level of analysis — exploratory engineering — deliberately excludes speculations regarding unknown or poorly understood physical phenomena. Exercises in design and analysis have shown that a composition of unproblematic components can suffice to implement surprising system-level capabilities. | |
Must new and surprising system-level results stem from new developments at a fundamental, physical level? A moment’s thought shows that this cannot be a fixed rule, because most innovation in engineering — whether surprising or not — involves no new scientific principles. | |
This is why the fundamental physical principles and operations that enable APM are quite familiar. Here’s an outline: | |
The physical basis of APM-based fabrication | |
|
|
Note that each of these operations — though in a context very different from an APM-style factory — is demonstrated by ribosomes, devices that build peptide nanostructures by positioning a series of activated molecular building blocks (aminoacyl-tRNA molecules) in sequences programmed by mRNA. | |
Predictive computational modeling of stiff structures | |
For suitably selected non-biological chemical and mechanical systems, each of these fundamental operations can be analyzed quantitatively. | |
In doing so, it’s convenient to explore systems built of components that consist of strong, stiff, covalent structures because these are easier to model than biomolecular systems. There are two key features of stiff covalent structures that facilitate modeling: First, these structures are insensitive to small errors in the potential-energy functions that underlie simulations of molecular dynamics; and second, severe conformational restrictions (a consequence of ubiquitous polycyclic structures) avoid the familiar challenge of evaluating the delicately balanced free energies that determine (for example) how proteins fold and interact with ligands in aqueous environments. Computational chemists will immediately see that these characteristics can greatly increase the predictive power and reduce the computational cost of simulations. | |
Similar remarks apply to the molecular physics of chemical transformations, where restricting translational and rotational degrees of freedom (and choosing favorable, well-understood reactions) can greatly increase the predictive power of density functional theory, and can facilitate the use of fully ab initio methods to model reactive structures and transition states. | |
As before, these features follow from design choices made in order to avoid poorly understood phenomena. Choices made to facilitate implementation of precursor technologies by means of accessible techniques lead to different structures and different challenges: Not rigid covalent structures, but flexible folding polymers and larger structures built using Brownian self-assembly. | |
Stiff covalent structures, although attractive and easy to model, will be among the most challenging synthetic targets; 'From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis' discusses a spectrum of prospective materials and techniques. | |
Thus, the current state of physical and computational technologies forces a choice between studying devices that are designed as targets for laboratory development and studying devices that are designed as targets for reliable computational modeling. In other words, relaxing the constraint of present-day synthetic accessibility enables the freedom to choose designs that enable confident present-day analysis. | |
High-throughput APM | |
Exploratory engineering methods have been applied to characterize devices with a range of functions sufficient to implement a broad class of mechanical systems, a class that includes conservatively designed APM systems. | |
Rather then designing devices and systems for optimal performance or near-term implementation, they can be designed to facilitate high-confidence modeling and analysis by means of standard physics-based methods. Within this constraint, conservative engineering choices can establish conservative lower bounds on system performance. Fortunately, devices based on stiff covalent structures can have favorable mechanical properties — high strength and stiffness, for example, and low sliding friction. | |
System-level analysis | |
At a molecular level, the fabrication of small building blocks is governed by the molecular physics of chemical reactions, and must be analyzed as such, and not in terms of conventional mechanical operations (or naïve anthropomorphic “fingers”). Organic synthesis and surface science provide a range of model reactions (for example, the reactions employed in chemical vapor deposition); quantum chemistry can used to study a yet wider range of reactions. | |
Studies of carefully selected structures at a larger scale (several nanometers) show that components and systems can be engineered to emulate a wide range of familiar mechanical devices. Here, several considerations are important. At interfaces between components, it is necessary to choose structures that are chemically stable and have favorable non-bonded surface interactions. For reliable mechanical operation, thermal fluctuations are a key concern. Thermal fluctuations impose requirements for energy barriers large enough to block transitions to unwanted states (typically > 50 kBT), entailing a suitable combination of structural stiffness (providing elastic restraints) and tolerance for positional displacements. | |
|
|
To summarize the results of an extended design exercise (presented in Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation, and reviewed in a National Academy of Sciences report), conservative engineering analysis shows that high-throughput APM can be performed by non-biological, factory-style systems that operate on a wide range of molecular building blocks to produce a wide range of non-biological materials, atomically precise nanostructures, and larger assemblies. These products include components and assemblies of the kinds necessary to implement similar factory-style systems. | |
These conclusions are a consequence of chemical and physical principles, and can be summarized as follows: | |
The physical basis of high-throughput APM-based fabrication of large products: | |
|
|
Lengthy yet accessible development paths lead from today’s extensive, million-atom scale capabilities for atomically precise fabrication to APM-level technologies of the kind outlined above; incremental development paths are outlined in the post From Self-Assembly to Mechanosynthesis and discussed in more depth in Appendix II of Radical Abundance. | |
By K. Eric Drexler
|
|
Become a Spotlight guest author! Join our large and growing group of guest contributors. Have you just published a scientific paper or have other exciting developments to share with the nanotechnology community? Here is how to publish on nanowerk.com. |